Constructing Religious Legitimacy through Religious Agency
The Restoration of the Theravāda Bhikkhunī Saṅgha in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59001/pjrs.v5i2.1291Keywords:
Bhikkhunī Saṅgha, Indonesia, Religious Agency, Religious Legitimacy, Theravāda BuddhismAbstract
The restoration of the Theravāda Bhikkhunī Saṅgha in Indonesia presents a compelling case of religious growth within an environment where institutional ordination remains contested. Drawing on a qualitative transcendental phenomenological design, this study examines how Indonesian Bhikkhunīs construct religious legitimacy through religious agency despite ongoing institutional contestation. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentary analysis with Bhikkhunīs, lay supporters, and monastic authorities. The findings reveal that religious legitimacy is constructed across three interconnected dimensions of agency: (1) spiritual self-formation through embodied Vinaya discipline and ethical practice, which grounds moral credibility; (2) collective capacity building via Dhamma education, monastery development, and transnational networking, which expands social presence; and (3) relational authority negotiation through non-confrontational engagement, digital communication, and strategic alliances, which navigates structural barriers. Together, these practices demonstrate that legitimacy is not merely a status conferred by formal institutions, but a dynamic, bottom-up social process earned through daily practice and communal engagement. Conceptually, the study advances an agency-based framework of religious legitimacy, offering broader analytical insights for understanding how restored, emerging, or marginalized religious actors establish authority under structural constraints.
Restorasi Saṅgha Bhikkhunī Theravāda di Indonesia menyajikan kasus pertumbuhan keagamaan yang menarik di dalam lingkungan tempat penahbisan institusional masih terkontestasi. Dengan menggunakan desain fenomenologi transendental kualitatif, penelitian ini menguji bagaimana para Bhikkhunī di Indonesia mengonstruksi legitimasi keagamaan melalui agensi keagamaan (religious agency) di tengah kontestasi institusional yang masih berlangsung. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi partisipatif, dan analisis dokumentasi bersama para Bhikkhunī, penyokong awam (lay supporters), serta otoritas monastik. Temuan penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa legitimasi keagamaan dikonstruksi melalui tiga dimensi agensi yang saling terhubung: (1) pembentukan diri secara spiritual (spiritual self-formation) melalui penghayatan disiplin Vinaya dan praktik etis, yang melandasi kredibilitas moral; (2) peningkatan kapasitas kolektif (collective capacity building) melalui pendidikan Dhamma, pembangunan vihara/biara, dan jaringan transnasional, yang memperluas kehadiran sosial; serta (3) negosiasi otoritas relasional (relational authority negotiation) melalui keterlibatan non-konfrontatif, komunikasi digital, dan aliansi strategis, yang menavigasi hambatan-hambatan struktural. Secara bersama-sama, praktik-praktik ini menunjukkan bahwa legitimasi bukanlah sekadar status yang diberikan oleh institusi formal, melainkan sebuah proses sosial dinamis dari bawah ke atas (bottom-up) yang diperoleh melalui praktik harian dan keterlibatan komunitas. Secara konseptual, penelitian ini memajukan kerangka kerja legitimasi keagamaan berbasis agensi (agency-based framework), yang menawarkan wawasan analitis lebih luas untuk memahami bagaimana aktor keagamaan yang dipulihkan, baru muncul, atau terpinggirkan membangun otoritas di bawah keterbatasan struktural.
References
Ammerman, N. T. (2006). Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives. Oxford University Press.
Ammerman, N. T. (2013). Sacred stories, spiritual tribes: Finding religion in everyday life. Oxford University Press.
Ammerman, N. T. (2015). Lived religion. In Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–8). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0207
Anālayo, B. (2013). The legality of bhikkhunī ordination. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 20, 310–333. https://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/
Anālayo, B. (2023). Studies in Āgama and Vinaya literature. Dharma Drum Publishing. https://buddhistuniversity.net/content/booklets/agama-vinaya-studies_analayo
Asad, T. (1997). Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
Costa, C., & Murphy, M. (2015). Bourdieu and the application of habitus across the social sciences. In C. Costa & M. Murphy (Eds.), Bourdieu, habitus and social research: The art of application (pp. 3–17). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137496928_1
Falk, M. L. (2007). Making fields of merit: Buddhist female ascetics and gendered orders in Thailand. University of Washington Press.
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309353415
Gross, R. M. (1993). Buddhism after patriarchy: A feminist history, analysis, and reconstruction of Buddhism. State University of New York Press.
Hamidah, H. (2022). Dinamika dan tradisi kelompok minoritas Budha dalam masyarakat Islam Melayu Palembang. Medina-Te: Jurnal Studi Islam, 18(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.19109/medinate.v18i1.6614
Kabilsingh, C. (1991). Thai women in Buddhism. Parallax Press.
Kaushik, G. (2026). Women and monastic Buddhism in early South Asia: Rediscovering the invisible believers. Routledge / Taylor & Francis Group.
Kieffer-Pülz, P. (2014). What the Vinayas can tell us about law. In M. A. Nathan & R. R. French (Eds.), Buddhism and law: An introduction (pp. 46–62). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139044134.005
Lai, S. Y. (2014). Buddhist women as agents of change: Case studies from Thailand and Indonesia. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, 16.
Langenberg, A. P. (2018). An imperfect alliance: Feminism and contemporary female Buddhist monasticisms. Religions, 9(6), 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9060190
Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press.
McGuire, M. B. (2008). Lived religion: Faith and practice in everyday life. Oxford University Press.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
Nyanabhadra, P. T., Sutawan, K., Susanto, S., & Tang, T. B. (2025). The future Buddhist education development in Indonesia: Reconstruction of Buddhism views and advocating for the Buddhayāna spirit movement to integrate into Indonesian Buddhist education. Kajian & Reviu Jinarakkhita: Jurnal Gerakan Semangat Buddhayana (JGSB), 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.60046/jgsb.v3i1.157
Orsi, R. A. (2005). Between heaven and earth: The religious worlds people make and the scholars who study them. Princeton University Press.
Phanthanaphruet, N. (2024). Bhikkhuni and social role in Sri Lanka. BUDDHO, 3(1), 31–39.
Salgado, N. S. (2019). On the question of “discipline” (Vinaya) and nuns in Theravāda Buddhism. Religions, 10(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020098
Suryadinata, L. (2018). Buddhism and Confucianism in contemporary Indonesia: Recent developments. In Chinese Indonesians (pp. 77–94). ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812305442-008
Tsomo, K. L. (Ed.). (1999). Buddhist women across cultures: Realizations. State University of New York Press.
Tsomo, K. L. (Ed.). (2004). Buddhist women and social justice: Ideals, challenges, and achievements. State University of New York Press.
