Peradaban Journal of Law and Society

Keabsahan dan Perlindungan Hukum Perjanjian Kerjasama Influencer dengan Platform Media Sosial

2025-06-16T14:54:23+07:00

This research analyzes the validity of the subject matter of the agreement, intellectual property rights (IPR) protection, as well as ethical issues and legal certainty in the cooperation agreement between influencers and social media platforms. Using a normative legal research method with legislative and conceptual approaches, this study aims to understand the legal aspects governing the relationship between influencers and platforms in the context of digital marketing. The main focus of this research is on the fulfillment of the requirements for a valid agreement as stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), and the necessity for clarity and transparency regarding the subject matter of the agreement, such as digital content and promotional services. The research also explores the potential violations of intellectual property rights by both the platform and the influencer, including the unauthorized use of content and plagiarism. The issue of imbalance in negotiating positions, where influencers are generally weaker compared to the platforms with greater bargaining power, is a key point of focus in this discussion. The study recommends enhancing transparency in agreements, standardizing intellectual property protection clauses, and harmonizing regulations related to digital contracts and consumer protection. Overall, the research concludes that improvements in the legal framework governing these collaborations are necessary to create a fairer environment and provide legal certainty for all parties involved.

Penelitian ini menganalisis keabsahan objek perjanjian, perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual (HKI), serta isu etika dan kepastian hukum dalam perjanjian kerjasama antara influencer dan platform media sosial. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan legislatif dan konseptual, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami aspek-aspek hukum yang mengatur hubungan antara influencer dan platform dalam konteks pemasaran digital. Fokus utama penelitian ini adalah pada pemenuhan syarat sah perjanjian menurut Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata), serta perlunya kejelasan dan transparansi terkait objek perjanjian, seperti konten digital dan layanan promosi. Penelitian juga mengeksplorasi potensi pelanggaran HKI baik oleh platform maupun influencer, termasuk penggunaan konten tanpa izin dan plagiarisme. Isu ketidakseimbangan posisi negosiasi, di mana influencer cenderung lebih lemah dibandingkan dengan platform yang memiliki kekuatan tawar lebih besar, menjadi sorotan utama dalam pembahasan ini. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan peningkatan transparansi dalam perjanjian, standarisasi klausul perlindungan HKI, serta harmonisasi regulasi yang berkaitan dengan kontrak digital dan perlindungan konsumen. Secara keseluruhan, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa perbaikan dalam kerangka hukum yang mengatur kerjasama ini diperlukan untuk menciptakan lingkungan yang lebih adil dan memberikan kepastian hukum bagi semua pihak yang terlibat.

Rethinking Same-Sex Marriage in the Global South

2025-07-01T15:27:07+07:00

This article explores the influence of global political will on the legalization of same-sex marriage in Third World countries, using a postcolonial and decolonial theoretical framework. By engaging with the critical perspectives of Talal Asad and Frantz Fanon, it examines how international human rights norms—particularly those framed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)—are often promoted as universal values rooted in Western liberal-secular traditions. The article argues that such norms, when imposed without sensitivity to local histories, cultures, and legal traditions, risk reproducing colonial patterns of epistemic domination. Asad critiques secularism as a hegemonic discourse that erases religious and communal legal frameworks, while Fanon identifies the persistence of colonial power through normative violence embedded in global law. The article calls for a dialogical and pluralistic approach to the globalization of human rights—one that respects normative sovereignty, acknowledges epistemic diversity, and avoids reducing justice to legal conformity with Western models.

Strengthening Customary Legal Autonomy in Aceh

2025-06-29T16:11:06+07:00

This study explores the urgency of strengthening the autonomy of legal dispute resolution through customary institutions in Aceh by applying two theoretical lenses: Eugen Ehrlich’s Living Law and Jasser Auda’s Maqasid al-Shariah. Customary institutions in Aceh play a central role in maintaining justice and social cohesion, yet they are often marginalized by formal state law. Through a normative-qualitative approach and literature-based analysis, this research finds that these institutions embody the core values of Living Law and are normatively aligned with the maqasid principles of life, intellect, dignity, and property. Auda’s systemic and contextual understanding of Islamic law provides a framework for recognizing the dynamic legal function of Acehnese adat within a pluralistic society. The synergy between these two paradigms offers a new methodological foundation for legal reform that is both locally grounded and ethically driven. This study concludes that empowering customary institutions is not a form of legal conservatism but an affirmation of legal pluralism and a step toward achieving substantive justice within Indonesia’s national legal system.

Pembaruan Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia

2025-07-01T14:19:26+07:00

The implementation of post-divorce rights for wives and children in Indonesia continues to face significant challenges, marked by a persistent gap between legal provisions and practical enforcement, with limited court rulings that fully guarantee these rights. This article aims to analyze the reform of Islamic family law in Indonesia and to compare the substance of post-divorce rights as regulated in statutory legislation with those articulated through the legal instruments of the Supreme Court. Employing a normative-comparative approach, this study finds that the Supreme Court has substantially reformed legal norms concerning post-divorce rights through various instruments—including Supreme Court Regulations (PERMA) and Circular Letters (SEMA)—issued between 2017 and 2022. These reforms, which include stricter obligations for payment prior to the pronouncement of divorce (ikrar talak), provisions for non-custodial parental access, more equitable considerations of economic capacity in determining financial support, and the introduction of enforcement mechanisms such as asset seizures for child support, reflect the Supreme Court’s ijtihad in alignment with the principles of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah as well as contemporary concerns of gender justice and human rights. This study contributes to mapping the dynamics and direction of Islamic family law reform in Indonesia, highlighting the strategic role of the Supreme Court in ensuring protection and legal certainty.

Implementasi hak-hak istri dan anak pasca perceraian di Indonesia masih menghadapi tantangan serius, ditandai oleh kesenjangan antara ketentuan hukum dan praktik di lapangan, dengan minimnya putusan pengadilan yang menjamin pemenuhan hak-hak tersebut. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis potret pembaruan hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia dan membandingkan substansi hak-hak istri dan anak pasca perceraian dalam peraturan perundang-undangan dengan produk hukum Mahkamah Agung. Menggunakan pendekatan normatif-komparatif, studi ini menemukan bahwa Mahkamah Agung telah secara signifikan memperbarui kaidah hukum terkait hak-hak pasca perceraian melalui berbagai produk hukumnya (Peraturan Mahkamah Agung/PERMA dan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung/SEMA) sejak 2017 hingga 2022. Pembaruan ini, yang mencakup kewajiban pembayaran yang lebih tegas sebelum ikrar talak, hak akses orang tua non-hak asuh, pertimbangan kemampuan ekonomi yang lebih adil dalam penentuan nafkah, serta mekanisme jaminan pemenuhan hak (seperti sita jaminan untuk nafkah anak), merefleksikan ijtihad Mahkamah Agung yang selaras dengan prinsip maqasid al-syariah serta isu-isu keadilan gender dan hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini berkontribusi dalam memetakan dinamika dan arah pembaruan hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia, menyoroti peran strategis Mahkamah Agung dalam memberikan perlindungan dan kepastian hukum.

Analisis Yuridis Wakaf Tanah Negara dalam Perspektif Hukum Agraria dan Hukum Wakaf

2025-06-23T18:52:15+07:00

Waqf, as an instrument for the distribution of wealth in Islam, necessitates full ownership by the waqif over the dedicated asset, as stipulated in Article 1, Paragraph 1 of Law Number 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf. This establishes that a valid element of waqf is the asset being legally owned by the waqif. However, Article 11 of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning Regulation Number 2 of 2017 concerning Procedures for Waqf Land Registration stipulates that Waqf Land on State Land that has not been previously encumbered with any Land Right shall be registered as Waqf Land under the nazhir's name. Yet, within the National Agrarian Law system, the state only possesses public control over land and does not hold private ownership of State Land. Although the state is not explicitly mentioned as a waqif, the state's action, (as if) acting as a waqif, conceptually raises legal issues. This research analyzes the norm conflict regarding waqf of State Land from the perspectives of Agrarian Law and Waqf Law in Indonesia. It employs a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis concludes that waqf of State Land without a prior concrete legal relationship with a legal subject as the waqif contradicts the principle of State Control Rights and the fundamental waqf principle of al-tamlik qabla al-tabarru’ (ownership before donation/waqf). This can lead to the non-fulfillment of waqf validity requirements. Therefore, it is necessary to pursue a mechanism for granting land ownership rights to qualified socio-religious legal entities to act as the waqif, followed by the waqf process.

Wakaf, sebagai instrumen distribusi harta dalam Islam, mensyaratkan adanya kepemilikan penuh dari pihak wakif atas objek yang diwakafkan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1 angka 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 tentang Wakaf. Bahwa salah satu unsur sahnya wakaf adalah harta benda yang dimiliki secara sah oleh Wakif. Namun, dalam Pasal 11 Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Tentang Tata Cara Pendaftaran Tanah Wakaf mengatur bahwa Tanah Wakaf atas Tanah Negara yang belum pernah dilekati dengan sesuatu Hak atas Tanah didaftarkan menjadi Tanah Wakaf atas nama Nazhir. Padahal dalam sistem Hukum Agraria Nasional, negara hanya berwenang menguasai tanah secara publik dan tidak memiliki secara keperdataan atas Tanah Negara. Meskipun tidak disebutkan secara eksplisit negara sebagai wakif, tindakan negara (seolah) sebagai wakif, secara konseptual menimbulkan persoalan. Penelitian ini menganalisis konflik norma tentang wakaf tanah yang berstatus tanah negara dalam perspektif Hukum Agraria dan Hukum Wakaf di Indonesia, menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil analisis menyimpulkan bahwa wakaf atas Tanah Negara tanpa lebih dulu adanya hubungan hukum kongkrit dengan subjek hukum sebagai wakif bertentangan dengan prinsip Hak Menguasai Negara dan Prinsip dasar wakaf, al-tamlik qabla al-tabarru’ (pemilikan sebelum hibah/wakaf). Hal ini dapat menimbulkan konsekuensi tidak terpenuhinya syarat sahnya wakaf. Oleh karena itu, perlu ditempuh mekanisme pemberian hak milik atas tanah kepada badan hukum sosial keagamaan yang memenuhi syarat untuk menjadi wakif yang kemudian dilanjutkan dengan proses wakaf.